Effectiveness of Digital Media in Socialization Implementation of the Hajj Pilgrimage in the Regency Kebumen

Authors

  • Arya Kosmanto STABN Raden Wijaya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64538/strategish.v1i2.40

Keywords:

media digital, haji, communication , information , socialization

Abstract

This research analyze effectiveness use of digital media in socialization organizing the Hajj pilgrimage at the Regency Ministry of Religion Office Kebumen 2025. The transformation of communication from conventional methods to digital platforms such as YouTube, WhatsApp, Instagram, and digital mail is the main focus of the study. A descriptive qualitative approach was used with interview, observation, and documentation techniques with informants consisting of the Head of the Hajj and Umrah Organization Section, Ministry of Religious Affairs employees, and prospective Hajj pilgrims. Data validation was carried out through source triangulation to ensure accuracy and objectivity. The results of the study indicate that digital media can accelerate information distribution, increase the reach of socialization, and provide easy access for prospective Hajj pilgrims. Digital platforms have shifted communication patterns from a conventional approach based on physical letters to an integrated system based on applications and social media. However, challenges such as low digital literacy among the elderly and limited infrastructure in certain areas remain significant obstacles. This study confirms that the effectiveness of digital media is greatly influenced by adaptive communication strategies and the support of religious instructors in the field in overcoming the digital divide.

References

Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2014). ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and program for research. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), DOI:10.1016/j.giq .2013.06.002

Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and conduct a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001

Berelson, B. (1952). Content Analysis in Communication Research. Free Press.

Berger, A. A. (2000). Media and Communication Research Methods: An Introduction to Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage Publications.

Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. DOI:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Belanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1365-2575.2005.00183.X

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Daymon, C., & Holloway, I. (2010). Qualitative Research Methods in Public Relations and Marketing Communications (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). Digital Era Governance: IT Corporations, the State, and e-Government. Oxford University Press.

Elo, S., & Kyngäs , H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115.

Gil-Garcia, J.R., & Luna-Reyes, L.F. (2006). Integrating conceptual approaches to e-government. Government Information Quarterly, 23(3), DOI:10.4018/978-1-59140-799-7.ch102

Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., & Antunes Marante, C. (2020). A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: Insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1159-1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12639

Holsti , O. R. (1969). Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Addison-Wesley.

Jensen, K. B. (2021). A Handbook of Media and Communication Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methodologies (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781138492905

Kim, S. T., & Weaver, D. (2002). Communication research about the internet: A thematic meta-analysis. New Media & Society, 4(4), 518-538. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144402321466796

Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Liu, D., Baumeister, R.F., Yang, C., & Hu, B. (2019). Digital communication media use and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 24(5), 259-273. DOI:10.1093/ jcmc /zmz013

Mahmudi. (2007). Regional Government Partnerships and Effectiveness Public Service . Sinergi , 9(1), 53-67. DOI:10.20885/sinergi.vol9.iss1.art4

McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail's Mass Communication Theory (6th ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.

Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002

Snelson, C. L. (2016). Qualitative and mixed methods social media research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 15(1), 1-15. DOI:10.1177/1609406915624574

West, D. M. (2004). E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 15-27.

West, R., & Turner, L. H. (2002). Introducing Communication Theory. McGraw-Hill Education.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-05